Ever wondered if the thrill of chasing NBA glory should ever trump sharing your voice in the podcast world? Draymond Green is stirring up some serious debate with his take on Paul George's choice to hit pause on his show, and it's got fans buzzing about loyalty to the mic versus the court.
The podcasting craze among current and former NBA stars shows no signs of fading, and Draymond Green is right in the thick of it. Besides running his flagship show, The Draymond Green Show, he also teams up with NFL reporter Jordan Schultz on Why Is Draymond Green Talking About Football. Recently, he shared his insights on the booming landscape of basketball podcasts and named his personal top three favorites.
Landing spots on Green's list are Jeff Teague’s Club 520, a spot where the former player dives into hoops talk with a unique flair; All the Smoke, hosted by veterans Stephen Jackson and Matt Barnes, dishing out raw, unfiltered stories from their playing days; and Mind the Game, featuring the dynamic duo of Steve Nash and LeBron James, who blend wisdom and strategy in ways that captivate listeners.
But here's where it gets controversial—Green excluded Paul George's Podcast P from his top picks, and he's not shy about why. George shelved the podcast in February to dedicate his energy fully to the struggling Philadelphia 76ers, a team he joined in the off-season with a massive four-year, $211.5 million contract. Green's disappointment stems from his belief that true dedication to podcasting means pushing through the tough spots, no matter what.
'I absolutely adored how Podcast P let the world finally glimpse Paul George's true self—the real P,' Green expressed. 'I've known him for ages, and that show was the first real peek for fans into his personality.'
Yet, Green couldn't include it in his elite three. 'As somebody who podcasted through a whole season and still snagged a championship ring with the Warriors in 2022, taking all the flak that came with it, you just don't bail out when things heat up, P,' he said. 'When the going gets rough, you can't just bow out gracefully. You've got to grind through it, because that's what we do—we podcast too. No breaks when the pressure's on like that.'
And this is the part most people miss: Green argues that juggling court success and podcast commitments is totally doable, drawing from his own experience. He proved it by balancing his shows with the Warriors' title run, even as critics piled on. For beginners new to NBA podcasts, think of it like this—podcasting for athletes isn't just side hustle; it's a way to connect authentically with fans, share behind-the-scenes insights, and build a personal brand beyond the game. Green's point is that stepping away sends a mixed message about commitment.
Of course, not everyone's on board with Green's stance. Some might argue that George's decision to prioritize the 76ers during a rocky 2024-25 season is a smart move, showing maturity and focus on the team's needs over personal projects. After all, with such a lucrative deal on the line, putting basketball first could be seen as responsible leadership. Is Green's criticism fair, or is it too harsh to call it 'quitting'? Does balancing multiple passions make you a champion or a multitasker spreading yourself thin?
What do you think? Do you side with Green, believing in powering through podcasting woes, or does George's pivot to team focus resonate with you as the right call? Drop your thoughts in the comments—let's debate this basketball buzz!
For more NBA insights, check out more on Sports Illustrated.